SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 708 | Next

Bradley, A. C. (Andrew Cecil), 1851-1935

"Shakespearean Tragedy Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth"

--
Three interpretations have been offered of the words 'He has no
children.'
(_a_) They refer to Malcolm, who, if he had children of his own, would
not at such a moment suggest revenge, or talk of curing such a grief.
Cf. _King John_, III. iv. 91, where Pandulph says to Constance,
You hold too heinous a respect of grief,
and Constance answers,
He talks to me that never had a son.
(_b_) They refer to Macbeth, who has no children, and on whom therefore
Macduff cannot take an adequate revenge.
(_c_) They refer to Macbeth, who, if he himself had children, could
never have ordered the slaughter of children. Cf. _3 Henry VI._ V. v.
63, where Margaret says to the murderers of Prince Edward,
You have no children, butchers! if you had,
The thought of them would have stirred up remorse.
I cannot think interpretation (_b_) the most natural. The whole idea of
the passage is that Macduff must feel _grief_ first and before he can
feel anything else, _e.g._ the desire for vengeance. As he says directly
after, he cannot at once 'dispute' it like a man, but must 'feel' it as
a man; and it is not till ten lines later that he is able to pass to the
thought of revenge. Macduff is not the man to conceive at any time the
idea of killing children in retaliation; and that he contemplates it
_here_, even as a suggestion, I find it hard to believe.


Pages:
696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720