This one disputed the findings of the first and required more standards.
The documents provided by Belmont were exceedingly poor copies
of file contents, much of which was over twenty years old.
Most of these so-called standards contained the handwriting
of more than one person. At no time was any evidence presented
that showed the standards sent by the administration to the
handwriting analysts to be the writing of Diana."
Remarking on the fact that the committee was chaired by
Henry Tarbuck who had already decided that Diana was guilty,
the A. G. wrote, "The committee applied different rules
of evidence to her and her witnesses, it badgered them
and cautioned them against giving hearsay testimony.
"The committee rejected direct evidence by one student who testified
under oath that she had written one of the `suspect' documents.
It ignored the testimony of Diana as well as that of her witnesses."
Then the LOD turned to the report from the hearing committee
that Henry had authored. One paragraph stated: "The effect of
the suspect critiques on the two people who were said to have
been hurt by them had not been assessed, but did affect the
individuals involved.
Pages:
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296