It did not mention that
the reason thirty-two additional standards were sent to the
second document examiner was because he could not make a decision
on the basis of the standards sent to the first one. Instead, it
claimed that the second document examiner confirmed the results
of the first. It also omitted to add that the standards sent were
abysmally poor copies from microfiche, covered a period of 25 years
and included handwriting and printing of many different people.
Henry thought the section called `Findings on considerations', was a gem.
After he had finished writing it, he had leaned back in his chair
and mentally patted himself on the back. Here was contained the only
mention that there had been other testimony entered into the hearing.
Here, in the entire six page report, only 10 lines were devoted to
the witnesses for Diana. The testimony of Sarah, he tersely
dismissed with: "One student witness identified one of the suspect
critiques and claimed that she (the student) had written it,
but the claim was not substantiated because the student
would not have her handwriting examined."
Months later, the investigator for the Attorney General would note
that incident in the transcript of the hearing and make the following
comment in her report.
Pages:
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279