The so-called `Factual history' was a composite of the testimony of Lyle,
Ian and Randy. It was carefully written. It reported that,
"Lyle had discovered several `suspicious' student feedback forms. . ."
when in fact he had said two.
The report was redolent with accusation. Phrases such as
". . .she forged. . ." and ". . .department could not
tolerate forgery. . ." were found throughout and put in a context
difficult to justify. One of these sentences read: "Given the opinion
of the handwriting experts that she had `forged student course
evaluations in a manner designed to denigrate the performance
of co-faculty members', the chairman of NERD decided to seek
termination for cause." Thus the document examiners were not
only given credit for identifying a person's handwriting,
but Henry claimed they were able to read the intent of the person
whom they said wrote the material examined. Nowhere in the
hearing were their clairvoyant abilities established.
Indeed, the entire section contained nothing of the events
as testified to by Diana and her witnesses.
The section on the `Procedures followed' was again taken
from what Henry had decided were the procedures followed
and wickedly slanted against Diana.
Pages:
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278