In the course of his work he answered this question in the affirmative
and pointed to the higher machines.
"There is no security"--to quote his own words--"against the ultimate
development of mechanical consciousness, in the fact of machines
possessing little consciousness now. A mollusc has not much
consciousness. Reflect upon the extraordinary advance which machines
have made during the last few hundred years, and note how slowly the
animal and vegetable kingdoms are advancing. The more highly organised
machines are creatures not so much of yesterday, as of the last five
minutes, so to speak, in comparison with past time. Assume for the sake
of argument that conscious beings have existed for some twenty million
years: see what strides machines have made in the last thousand! May not
the world last twenty million years longer? If so, what will they not in
the end become? Is it not safer to nip the mischief in the bud and to
forbid them further progress?
"But who can say that the vapour engine has not a kind of consciousness?
Where does consciousness begin, and where end? Who can draw the line?
Who can draw any line? Is not everything interwoven with everything? Is
not machinery linked with animal life in an infinite variety of ways? The
shell of a hen's egg is made of a delicate white ware and is a machine as
much as an egg-cup is: the shell is a device for holding the egg, as much
as the egg-cup for holding the shell: both are phases of the same
function; the hen makes the shell in her inside, but it is pure pottery.
Pages:
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267